Want one lens that covers travel, events, and smooth video without weighing you down or blowing your budget?

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM promises versatile reach, built-in stabilization, and video-friendly AF in a lighter, lower-cost package than pro L-series glass, and I took it into the field to see how that plays out.

If you shoot as a traveler, hybrid creator, or event photographer and care about real-world flexibility more than pro-grade ruggedness, this review will matter to you—Make sure to read the entire review as I break down where it shines and where it stumbles, keep reading.

Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM

Compact, everyday standard zoom offering smooth stepping-motor autofocus for quiet video, image stabilization for steady handheld shooting, and versatile framing for travel, portraits, and landscapes.

Check Price

The Numbers You Need

How It’s Built

In my testing the Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM balances nicely on a full-frame DSLR and feels noticeably lighter than pro-grade zooms. The weight makes it easy to carry all day without tiring your shoulders. The zoom ring has smooth, predictable resistance and the focus ring is easy to nudge for quick manual adjustments.

Build-wise it’s clearly a consumer-oriented lens — solid in the hand but not as tough as Canon’s L-series. That means I wouldn’t want to push it in heavy rain or dusty environments without extra protection. For everyday shooting it holds up well and doesn’t feel fragile.

I found the stabilization and autofocus controls easy to reach and click between modes while working a wedding or a street shoot. The hood mounted securely and filters threaded on smoothly, so swapping polarizers or ND wasn’t a fuss. STM focusing feels buttery for video and quiet enough not to ruin clip audio.

What I liked most was the combo of light carry and smooth video-focused AF. What could be better is the overall ruggedness — pros will miss weather sealing. For beginners this means great portability and simple controls, but pack a rain cover if you plan rough conditions.

In Your Hands

The 24–105mm reach feels like a photographer’s Swiss Army knife: wide enough for sweeping landscapes, comfortably framed for street work and environmental portraits, and long enough to tighten composition without changing lenses. On the camera it simplifies decision-making, letting you move and crop with intent rather than constantly swapping glass.

Because the iris changes as you zoom, exposure and depth-of-field shift in predictable ways, so you’ll notice brightness and subject separation vary as you breathe in or out of focal lengths. That variability calls for a bit more attention to settings compared with constant-aperture zooms, but it also encourages creative use of distance and framing.

The optical stabilization is genuinely useful for handheld shooting, taming camera shake in dimmer conditions and letting you pull off slower shutter speeds more confidently. For video the steadiness and the lens’ fluid behavior during pans translate into smooth clips, making it an easy choice for run-and-gun hybrid work.

Optically the lens delivers pleasant contrast and warm, faithful color in everyday lighting, and flare is managed well enough for backlit scenes with mindful composition. You’ll see some corner shading and occasional color fringing in high-contrast edges, but those issues are straightforward to correct in post and don’t detract from usable results.

In practice it’s a brilliant walkaround and travel companion: light to carry, flexible for events and documentary days, and well suited to creators who shoot both stills and video thanks to its stabilization and smooth focusing behavior. It’s the kind of lens you reach for when versatility and convenience matter most.

The Good and Bad

• Versatile 24–105mm range on full-frame
• Optical image stabilization for stills and video
• STM delivers smooth, video-friendly focus transitions
• Lighter and lower-cost positioning versus pro L-series options

• Variable f/3.5–5.6 aperture; exposure and depth-of-field change while zooming
• Less rugged build; not on par with L-series weather sealing and durability

Ideal Buyer

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM is ideal for enthusiast full-frame shooters who want one flexible lens that covers everything from landscapes to portraits. It’s a budget-friendly step up from kit glass that keeps a DSLR travel-ready without breaking the bank. It performs well on weekend shoots and small paid gigs where portability and price matter.

Hybrid creators—YouTubers and videographers who also shoot stills—will appreciate the STM motor and optical IS for smooth focus pulls and steadier handheld clips. It trades pro-level weather sealing for quieter, more film-friendly autofocus that’s useful on interviews. The AF is smooth and unobtrusive during interviews and run-and-gun shoots.

Travel photographers benefit from the broad 24–105mm reach and modest weight, which encourages roaming with a single lens. You sacrifice the constant f/4 advantage, but gain fewer lens swaps and lighter carry on long days. Its focal spread handles landscapes, street scenes and tighter portraits without swapping glass.

Event and general-purpose shooters who prioritize versatility and cost-effectiveness over top-tier optics will find this lens a reliable everyday tool. If you need L-series durability, constant aperture, or the fastest AF for fast-action work, look elsewhere; otherwise this is a practical, well-rounded choice. For enthusiasts who edit RAW, modest edge issues are easily corrected and the savings can fund other gear.

Better Alternatives?

We’ve already walked through what the Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM does well: a light, affordable walkaround zoom with stabilisation and smooth, video-friendly AF. It’s a great everyday lens when you want one piece of glass to cover landscapes, street, portraits and run-and-gun video.

If you need more in one area—tougher build, steadier optics across the frame, or a constant aperture—there are a few clear alternatives that trade the STM’s light weight and low price for stronger performance in specific ways. Below I’ll cover three lenses I’ve actually used and tell you what each one does better and worse compared with the 24-105mm STM, and the kind of buyer who’ll prefer it.

Alternative 1:

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L

Professional-grade constant-aperture standard zoom delivering exceptional sharpness, robust weather-sealed construction, fast and accurate autofocus, and consistent low-light performance—ideal for advanced enthusiasts and working photographers.

Check Price

I’ve used the Canon 24-105mm f/4 L on weddings and travel jobs, and what hits you first is the build. It’s heavier, feels solid in your hand, and stands up to dust and light rain in ways the STM doesn’t. In the field that means fewer worries when the weather changes or you’re working all day outdoors.

Optically it’s cleaner across the frame compared with the STM. You’ll see better edge and corner detail and more consistent contrast from 24 to 105mm, and the constant f/4 makes exposure and depth-of-field predictable as you zoom. The trade-off is weight, cost, and that you lose the slightly wider f/3.5 at 24mm the STM gives you—practically, the L’s extra sharpness and reliability usually make up for that.

Who should pick it: working pros or serious enthusiasts who need tougher build, faster USM AF for stills, and consistent image quality across the zoom. If you shoot events, travel in rough conditions, or need the peace of mind of weather sealing, this is the lens I’d reach for over the STM.

Alternative 2:

Sigma Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 Art

Premium Art-series standard zoom engineered for outstanding sharpness and contrast, delivering cinematic micro-contrast, robust build, and refined rendering for high-resolution sensors and demanding creatives.

Check Price

The Sigma 24-105mm f/4 Art surprised me with how sharp it is for the price. On landscape and high-detail work it often out-resolves the STM, giving crisper files that hold up when you crop. The constant f/4 again helps keep exposure consistent and gives the long end an advantage over the STM’s f/5.6.

Where it falls short versus the Canon STM is mostly in handling and AF quirks. In my experience Sigma’s AF can be rock-solid but sometimes needs a micro-adjust on certain bodies, and it isn’t as reliably weather-sealed as the Canon L. For run-and-gun video the STM’s smooth quiet focus still has an edge; Sigma is more aimed at stills and high-detail work.

Who should pick it: photographers who want the best image quality for the money—travel shooters, landscape photographers, and anyone on a budget who still wants near-L-level sharpness. If you don’t need pro weather-sealing and you don’t mind checking AF on your camera, this is a great value step up from the STM.

Alternative 3:

Sigma Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 Art

High-performance standard zoom offering razor-sharp corner-to-corner resolution, refined color rendition, minimized aberrations, and a responsive manual focus feel—perfect for studio, travel, and high-detail landscape work.

Check Price

Looking at the same Sigma from a different angle, I’ve used it in studio and landscape shoots where color and corner-to-corner detail matter. Compared to the STM you get a cleaner image with less visible fringing and better micro-contrast, so prints and large crops look noticeably better straight from the camera.

On the downside for everyday run-and-gun use, the Sigma is bulkier than the STM and the AF sound and behavior are not as video-friendly. Manual focus feel is good, but if your workflow relies on quiet, smooth AF moves for video, the STM still wins. Also expect a bit more weight in your bag versus the small STM unit.

Who should pick it: studio shooters, landscape photographers, and anyone after the highest image quality from a 24–105 range who is willing to carry a bit more weight and accept fewer video-friendly features. If your priority is sharp, clean files and you mainly shoot stills, this Sigma is a smart alternative to the STM.

What People Ask Most

Conclusion

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM is an affable, do-everything zoom that leans into versatility rather than pro-grade perfection. With broad focal reach, dependable optical stabilization and video-friendly STM focusing, it’s the lens you grab for travel, events, and hybrid shoots when carrying one optic matters.

Strengths are obvious: lightweight handling, usable image stabilization and buttery autofocus transitions for video. Weaknesses are equally clear — the variable aperture forces exposure and depth-of-field shifts while zooming, AF speed and subject tracking trail USM-driven pro lenses, and construction is consumer-grade rather than L-series rugged. These compromises are fine if portability, price and multifunctional use top your checklist.

For hybrid creators, travelers and everyday shooters who want stabilization and smooth video AF without breaking the bank, this lens delivers strong practical value and real-world convenience. It shines where flexibility and low weight matter more than absolute optical perfection.

If you need consistent f/4 performance, tougher construction or faster tracking, step up to the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM or consider the Sigma 24-105mm f/4 Art for sharper, more consistent results. If pro handling, weather sealing and optical uniformity matter more than the extra reach, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM is the better compromise. For many enthusiasts, though, the STM version remains the pragmatic, pocket-friendly choice.

Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM

Compact, everyday standard zoom offering smooth stepping-motor autofocus for quiet video, image stabilization for steady handheld shooting, and versatile framing for travel, portraits, and landscapes.

Check Price